post

Breaking News, World News, Ghana News, Sports, Business, Innovation, Climate, Culture, Travel, Video

NSEM

A weapons test this week has become the latest point of contention between North and South Korea, with Pyongyang saying they fired an advanced multiple warhead missile and Seoul accusing them of lying.



Hours after North Korean state media lauded the &#8220;success&#8221; of their test and ran pictures as proof on Thursday, the South called it &#8220;deception and exaggeration&#8221; and released their own evidence pointing towards failure.



Analysts meanwhile remain uncertain about the truth of the North&#8217;s claims.



The dispute underscores the complexities of verifying North Korea&#8217;s weapons development, which continues to advance despite severe international sanctions.



If North Korea&#8217;s latest claims are true, it would represent significant progress in their missile programme.



Multiple warhead missiles are difficult to defend against and the technology is challenging to develop. Currently only the US &#8211; which first developed it in the 1960s &#8211; as well as the UK, France, Russia and China are known to have these capabilities.



Pyongyang is now trumpeting that they are a step closer to achieving it as well.



MIRV stands for multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle. The technology involves attaching several warheads to a single missile that would separate after launch. The warheads would then be powered by their own rockets to hit various targets.



They can be released at different speeds and in multiple directions, allowing them to hit targets hundreds of kilometres apart from one another. This is what makes these weapons particularly efficient.



Pyongyang said on Thursday that it had &#8220;successfully conducted the separation and guidance control test of individual mobile warheads&#8221; the day before. The weapon, it said, used the first-stage engine of an intermediate-range solid-fuel ballistic missile, and deployed three warheads plus a decoy.



The missile travelled a &#8220;shortened range&#8221; of 170 to 200km (105 to 124 miles) to ensure safety and measure the flights of the warheads, said state media. The warheads were each &#8220;guided correctly&#8221; to their targets while anti-air radar found the decoy had effectively deployed as well.



The test was of &#8220;great significance in bolstering&#8221; their missile forces and was aimed at &#8220;securing the MIRV capability&#8221;, which has been set as a top priority.



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/83cb/live/84123d10-3523-11ef-a044-9d4367d5b599.jpg.webp" alt="Reuters A view of an individual mobile combat separation and guidance control test conducted by the the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's Missile General Directorate at unknown location according to KCNA (Korean Central News Agency), in this image released by the Korean Central News Agency on June 26, 2024. "/><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">North Korean state media said this photo showed the decoy separating from the missile</figcaption></figure>



South Korea&#8217;s military however was quick to debunk these claims, saying the &#8220;flight was not normal&#8221; and that the weapon had exploded mid-flight.



It released a video it had filmed of the test, saying that the initial stage showed an unstable flight that led to a mid-air explosion. Military officials said they detected a large amount of debris, more than what should result from a successful test.



They also said North Korea&#8217;s pictures purportedly showing the warheads and decoy separating from the missile were actually pictures of an intercontinental ballistic missile test carried out in March.



Analysts cited by South Korean news agency Yonhap pointed out that the range of the test was more typically seen in intercontinental ballistic missile tests. They also believed the missile may have had insufficient guidance and control systems.



Other experts believe some parts of the test succeeded &#8211; though much remains unknown.



Yang Uk, a researcher at Asan Institute for Policy Studies, told the BBC that while he believed the flight and separation of warheads had worked, &#8220;North Korea has not revealed evidence whether the warheads reached their targets &#8211; we cannot say they succeeded here&#8221;.



Japan&#8217;s defence ministry said the missile achieved a maximum altitude of 100km. This meant it did not enter outer space and instead stayed in the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. Dr Yang said this also meant that &#8220;the warheads were not tested for the high heat and pressure that follow re-entry into atmosphere, so we cannot know their capabilities

BROWSE

Advertisement

North Korea says it fired a new weapon – is it lying?

AUTHOR: CHRISTOPHER RANSON

About us

Explore

Resources

Discover

Connect